A SoapBlox Politics Blog
[Mobile Edition]
About
- About Us
- Email Us (news/tips)
- Editorial Policy
- Posting Guidelines
- Advertise Here
Feedburner

Subscribe to Michlib daily email summary. (Preview)
Enter address:

Donate
Become a sponsor and support our work.

 MichLib sponsor list

Michigan Political Blog Ad Network

Advertise Liberally

50 State Ad Network

UNITE-HERE Midwest (including Michigan) Endorses John Edwards

by: philgoblue

Thu Dec 06, 2007 at 09:49:15 AM EST


While the national announced on Wednesday that it is waiting until after Iowa, the UNITE-HERE Midwest Region (which includes UNITE-HERE Michigan) has endorsed John Edwards for President.

Noel Beasley, manager of the Chicago and Midwest Regional Joint Board, said of her membership:

Our members are emphatic in their support for Senator Edwards, and anxious to get involved.
philgoblue :: UNITE-HERE Midwest (including Michigan) Endorses John Edwards
The Midwest Regional Joint Board represents over 50,000 workers in clothing factories, hotels and restaurants, sports venues, gaming casinos, airports, laundries, warehouses and auto parts facilities, etc. in 11 states including Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin (there are two independent locals in Chicago who are not part of the Midwest Board and have not endorsed anyone).  Beasley said the board's support for Edwards was longtime and unanimous.

The Chicago and Midwest Regional Joint Board plans to go to work for the former North Carolina senator immediately -- with volunteers, staff and financial assistance -- and will work in conjunction with other unions including the SEIUs that cover the territory and have endorsed Edwards (Iowa, Ohio, Michigan and Minnesota).  Beasley states that they should have 40 to 50 volunteers and staff in Iowa within a week.

AP and the Las Vegas Review-Journal report that UNITE-HERE national and the semi-independent Culinary Union Local 226 (with 60,000 members in Las Vegas) decided to delay an endorsement until early January.  Clearly, they're a bit spooked and are waiting to make sure that Edwards and will make it to Nevada.  With Nevada's caucus on 19 January (just 16 days after the Iowa causcuses) they'll have to crank up the political organizational drive into high gear with a decision likely on 4 January.

Here's Pilar Weiss, political director of Culinary 226:

We've always said that part of what was important to us was that we wanted to have a candidate who was a good fit with our members and we also wanted to see that people had viable campaigns and were poised to do well nationally. I don't think it's cowardly to say that we want to see how this stuff plays out in the next couple weeks.

UNITE HERE general president Bruce Raynor, who has been public about his support for Edwards, insisted that UNITE-HERE would not mimic the Service Employees International Union, whose national leaders could not reach a consensus and left it to local state councils to issue endorsements.
We're not going to follow that [since it would] dilute [our] influence on the process.

An additional reason for the delay is that Culinary (the largest local in UNITE-HERE by far) just finished contentious contract negotiations with Las Vegas casinos and hotels.  One outcome of the discussions within UNITE-HERE is that there will be a single endorsement and Culinary 226 will be part of that endorsement, accoring to the Las Vegas Sun's Michael Mishak.

There is a good chance that whoever receives the endorsement of Culinary will win the Nevada Democratic caucus since the union has over 60,000 members in a state that had only 7,000 caucus goers in 2004 and plays a large role in the Nevada Democratic Party.

Chris Chafe, both a senior adviser to Edwards' campaign on labor and in Nevada and a former chief of staff and political director of UNITE-HERE commented on the events:

I think that Senator Edwards has a deep, deep level of support across UNITE HERE. There are many parts of the union that have a long history with him. [The Midwest board, a coalition of union locals in 11 states, is significant because it] spans all the battleground states in the Midwest. They understand who is the most electable Democrat for November.

UNITE, the Union of Needletrades, Textiles and Industrial Employees, endorsed Edwards in 2004 before merging with the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union to form UNITE HERE.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Nope (4.00 / 2)
Edwards is not following the RULES. If he wants Michigan's votes, he has to actually campaign here.

Sorry phil, but RULES are RULES.

Nothing is easier than solving a problem on the back of the poor. People who don't have lobbyists or clout.


He will be (4.00 / 3)
for a 2/9 caucus.

Wanna bet?


[ Parent ]
Edwards Has Been to Michigan Several Times (4.00 / 2)
Edwards Speech at the MDP Jefferson-Jackson Dinner in April (with video): http://michiganforedwards.blog...

Edwards in Detroit in June: http://michiganforedwards.blog...

Elizabeth in Grand Rapids in September: http://michiganforedwards.blog... and http://michiganforedwards.blog...

West Michigan Rising: The Progressive Blog for Our (future) Left Coast


[ Parent ]
ba ha (4.00 / 2)
The MDP is currently considering holding an illegal "primary" against their own rules and DNC rules.

West Michigan Rising: The Progressive Blog for Our (future) Left Coast

[ Parent ]
congrats (0.00 / 0)
on your matching REC diary at dkos!

[ Parent ]
unite here, isn't that the group that dissed the AFL-CIO? (0.00 / 0)


If you really have something to add (2.00 / 2)
write it and link to it.  If you want to be a malcontent lurker, try Redstate.org.

[ Parent ]
My bad ... I thought everyone knew. Google John Sweeney and AFL-CIO and Unite Here (4.00 / 2)
"It's far easier to tear down a union movement than to build one.  America's working people cannot afford for unions to declare 'it's my way or the highway' when workers are under the biggest assault in 80 years.  Unity and solidarity are the cornerstone of our strength."  

...John Sweeney, President, AFL-CIO


[ Parent ]
Thank you. I was not aware of that comment. (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
I was a huge supporter of Edwards in 2004 (4.00 / 2)
But then I saw how little influence Michigan, the Michigan Democratic Party/Caucus, and my own participation had on the Democratic nomination that year.

So being an Edwards supporter in '04 led me to oppose not only a late caucus (and in 2008 February 9th, is late) but the entire system where Iowa & New Hampshire determine the Democratic nominee and the other 48 states have virtually no say in the matter.

Although Michigan still won't have a say in the Democratic nominee in 2008, I have confidence that Michigan's and Florida's protests will lead to a more democratic system in 2012 and beyond.

"I never did give anybody hell. I just told the truth and they thought it was hell." -- Harry S Truman


According to Dingell and Anuzis (4.00 / 3)
you are right about 2012, as long as you know the answer to the following question:

Heads or Tails?


[ Parent ]
Sorry (2.00 / 2)
after seeing the Breck Boy get his rear handed to him by Cheney in the one debate they had there is no way I can support him.  If you don't have the guts to stick a shiv in Darth Cheney there is no way you can be President.

"Win if you can, lose is you must, but ALWAYS cheat!" -- Jesse Ventura

"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going. Wooooo!" -- Ric Flair


You should start all of your posts (2.00 / 2)

with sorry.

As for your observation of the debate, there are plenty who disagree.  

But, you have your opinions.  Fortunately, most of them end up as hidden comments.


[ Parent ]
Is this the same John Edwards who refused to condem South Carolina's right to work law? (4.00 / 1)
So much for being a labor man.

"Win if you can, lose is you must, but ALWAYS cheat!" -- Jesse Ventura

"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going. Wooooo!" -- Ric Flair


[ Parent ]
Not True? Take It Up With The Hill. (4.00 / 1)


"Win if you can, lose is you must, but ALWAYS cheat!" -- Jesse Ventura

"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going. Wooooo!" -- Ric Flair


[ Parent ]
Face It Your Boy Is A Fraud. (4.00 / 1)
 November 15, 2007

Former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) has made support for and from organized labor one of the centerpieces of his 2008 presidential campaign, but some labor officials say Edwards is new to their cause and the former senator's rhetoric is at odds with his record.

With the Democratic candidates set to debate Thursday night in Nevada, a state where labor still carries considerable clout, Edwards's rivals and the unions backing them are criticizing the former senator's past support for issues that are anathema to the labor community.

Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), in a speech to the United Auto Workers (UAW) in Iowa this week, aimed at both of his chief rivals. After hitting Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) for her past support of NAFTA, he took an indirect shot at Edwards, saying: "When a candidate says he opposes right-to-work laws or trade rules that hurt workers today, ask him where he's been before."

In 1998, while running for the Senate, Edwards did not come out in favor of repealing right-to-work laws in North Carolina, and he has only opposed a national right-to-work law. While North Carolina is hardly considered to be a labor stronghold, the former senator's record and his relationship with some unions in the state were used by some unions to judge him as unworthy of an endorsement.

The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), which endorsed Sen. Chris Dodd (Conn.), said Edwards's unwillingness to advocate a repeal of the right-to-work measure was a sticking point for the membership when it was seriously considering supporting the former senator's bid.

"How do you walk picket lines and be for right-to-work?" Jeffrey Zack, an IAFF official, said. "It's surprising that it wasn't disconcerting to more people.

"Ultimately, at the end of the day, it's results. It's not what you say. It's results."

http://thehill.com/leading-the...

"Win if you can, lose is you must, but ALWAYS cheat!" -- Jesse Ventura

"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going. Wooooo!" -- Ric Flair


[ Parent ]
US Senators Don't Have Jurisdiction (0.00 / 0)
If you read the entire quote, in context, Edwards was saying that as a US Senator the best thing he could do to increase wages in NORTH Carolina was to increase the FEDERAL minimum wage.

West Michigan Rising: The Progressive Blog for Our (future) Left Coast

[ Parent ]
FRAUD (4.00 / 1)
I read it correctly.  He refused to condemn the redneck right to work law in his own state.

How can you refute the following sentence:

"In 1998, while running for the Senate, Edwards did not come out in favor of repealing right-to-work laws in North Carolina"

Face the facts that Edwards portray as a tribune of the working man is a fraud.  I like him but I wish he was a bit more honest.


"Win if you can, lose is you must, but ALWAYS cheat!" -- Jesse Ventura

"Whether you like it or not, learn to love it, because its the best thing going. Wooooo!" -- Ric Flair


[ Parent ]
Yea..he's incorrect (0.00 / 0)
it was North Carolina that he said he would not repeal ight to Work.

[ Parent ]
Phil (4.00 / 2)
I went to your site in ActBlue today to donate money to Edwards.  It wouldn't take it.  It kept saying I had to enter my address, and it was already in there.  Eventually I gave up and went to his website and gave.  Sorry I couldn't do it through you.  Keep up the good fight.  


Search
Progressive Blogroll
For MI Bloggers:
- MI Bloggers Facebook
- MI Bloggers Myspace
- MI Bloggers PartyBuilder
- MI Bloggers Wiki

Statewide:
- Blogging for Michigan
- Call of the Senate Dems
- [Con]serving Michigan (Michigan LCV)
- DailyKos (Michigan tag)
- Enviro-Mich List Serve archives
- Democratic Underground, Michigan Forum
- Jack Lessenberry
- JenniferGranholm.com
- LeftyBlogs (Michigan)
- MI Eye on Bishop
- Michigan Coalition for Progress
- Michigan Messenger
- MI Idea (Michigan Equality)
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan
- Rainbow Mittens
- The Upper Hand (Progress Michigan)

Upper Peninsula:
- Keweenaw Now
- Lift Bridges and Mine Shafts
- Save the Wild UP

Western Michigan:
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott
- Mostly Sunny with a Chance of Gay
- Public Pulse
- West Michigan Politics
- West Michigan Rising
- Windmillin'

Mid-Michigan:
- Among the Trees
- Blue Chips (CMU College Democrats Blog)
- Christine Barry
- Conservative Media
- Far Left Field
- Graham Davis
- Honest Errors
- ICDP:Dispatch (Isabella County Democratic Party Blog)
- Liberal, Loud and Proud
- Livingston County Democratic Party Blog
- MI Blog
- Mid-Michigan DFA
- Pohlitics
- Random Ramblings of a Somewhat Common Man
- Waffles of Compromise
- YAF Watch

Flint/Bay Area/Thumb:
- Bay County Democratic Party
- Blue November
- East Michigan Blue
- Genesee County Young Democrats
- Greed, Eggs, and Ham
- Jim Stamas Watch
- Meddling Outsider
- Saginaw County Democratic Party Blog
- Stone Soup Musings
- Voice of Mordor

Southeast Michigan:
- A2Politico
- arblogger
- Arbor Update
- Congressman John Conyers (CD14)
- Mayor Craig Covey
- Councilman Ron Suarez
- Democracy for Metro Detroit
- Detroit Skeptic
- Detroit Uncovered (formerly "Fire Jerry Oliver")
- Grosse Pointe Democrats
- I Wish This Blog Was Louder
- Kicking Ass Ann Arbor (UM College Democrats Blog)
- LJ's Blogorific
- Mark Maynard
- Michigan Progress
- Motor City Liberal
- North Oakland Dems
- Oakland Democratic Politics
- Our Michigan
- Peters for Congress (CD09)
- PhiKapBlog
- Polygon, the Dancing Bear
- Rust Belt Blues
- Third City
- Thunder Down Country
- Trusty Getto
- Unhinged

MI Congressional
District Watch Blogs:
- Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood (CD08)

MI Campaigns:
MI Democratic Orgs:
MI Progressive Orgs:
MI Misc.:
National Alternative Media:
National Blogs:
Powered by: SoapBlox