A SoapBlox Politics Blog
[Mobile Edition]
About
- About Us
- Email Us (news/tips)
- Editorial Policy
- Posting Guidelines
- Advertise Here
Feedburner

Subscribe to Michlib daily email summary. (Preview)
Enter address:

Donate
Become a sponsor and support our work.

 MichLib sponsor list

Michigan Political Blog Ad Network

Advertise Liberally

50 State Ad Network

Right to choose shouldn't be a class issue for women

by: MarkSchauer

Tue Nov 17, 2009 at 10:58:47 AM EST


( - promoted by Eric B.)

As the son of a nurse who worked in primary care for many years, I've long held the belief that decisions about childbearing should be made by a woman in consultation with her family and doctor. The government doesn't belong in the room when these very personal, private decisions are being made.

Unfortunately, the debate over abortion - a legal, constitutionally-protected medical procedure - has become a wedge issue in the larger effort to reform our nation's broken health care system.

Since current federal law already bans the use of federal funds to pay for abortions, and nothing in the Affordable Health Care for America Act changes the Hyde Amendment, I didn't hesitate to vote against the amendment introduced by my colleague Bart Stupak.

This measure represents a dangerous step towards making abortion a class-based procedure that only wealthy women could afford.

Under Mr. Stupak's amendment, women who don't get their health insurance through their employer and purchase affordable coverage through the new Health Insurance Exchange, would be denied the ability to buy a health insurance policy that covers abortion services - even when using their own money. That's right: none of the private plans or public insurance options found in the Exchange would be allowed to cover abortion.

MarkSchauer :: Right to choose shouldn't be a class issue for women
Essentially, low-income, working and middle-class women whose only means of obtaining health insurance is through the Exchange would need to pay extra out-of-pocket to add a separate rider to their policy that covers this legal procedure.  Ironically, 87% of employer-based plans currently cover abortion services.  Even the Republican National Committee's health insurance plan for its employees covered abortion services - that is until, to score political points, its chairman changed their coverage.

Under our current broken health care system, women pay 48% more for the same health coverage as their male counterparts and under current law the health insurance industry considers domestic violence as a "pre-existing condition." These failures are among the reasons we need health care reform in the first place. So instead of making health insurance more affordable for women, they would still end up paying more for the same coverage under the Stupak amendment.

In January 1973, our nation decided that a woman could choose abortion in the earlier months of pregnancy without restriction. Not only does the Stupak amendment add unnecessary restrictions to a woman's right to choose, but it will end up costing women more and turning abortion into a class-based procedure.

This is wrong - and it's why I'm committed to stripping this burdensome measure from the final health care reform bill before it hits the President's desk.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Gutsy Move (4.00 / 4)
Considering the constituency, this has to be considered a gutsy vote for Rep. Schauer.  Congrats to him for doing the right thing rather than the expedient thing.

... (4.00 / 2)
Schauer has been a pleasant surprise.  I mean, I know he talked a good progressive game when he was in the state Senate and when he was running for the House, but both he and Gary Peters have acquitted themselves well once in office.  I'm not as impressed with his vote as I am with writing something like this.  He could have always written his health care vote off to the need to revamp the system before everything else.  Here, he takes that a step further on behalf of choice.

Good on 'em.

Among the Trees


[ Parent ]
Totally Agree (0.00 / 0)
   Rep Schauer has been terrific so far.  

[ Parent ]
Agree (0.00 / 0)
Peters is my Rep. now, and I'm really pleased so far.  Both Peters and Schauer are good additions to the MI delegation.

Peters has signed on as a co-sponsor of HR 1283 (DADT repeal) and HR 3017 (ENDA), which pleases me no end.  I suspect these might be a step too far for the 7th district, so I'm not going to rag on Rep. Schauer too much at this point.


[ Parent ]
... (4.00 / 1)
As my Congressman, I appreciate Rep. Schauer voting for health care reform that includes a public option even though he may disagree with the Stupak amendment that was included in that reform package.  I hope he will continue to do so even if an agreement with the Senate retains the Stupak language.

Thank you, Mark Schauer (0.00 / 0)
Although I'm not in either district, I traveled back and forth between the Schauer and Peters campaigns (plus data entry and such for Obama in the late evenings).  I'm glad they've both made a strong impact in their first session.

I listened to Mark's floor speech during the Saturday debate, he did a fine job, and somebody in the room with me immediately decided to send Mark $1,000 as soon as she could afford it.  Don't forget, first re-elect is usually the toughest, and they both will need our help again....



Search
Progressive Blogroll
For MI Bloggers:
- MI Bloggers Facebook
- MI Bloggers Myspace
- MI Bloggers PartyBuilder
- MI Bloggers Wiki

Statewide:
- Blogging for Michigan
- Call of the Senate Dems
- [Con]serving Michigan (Michigan LCV)
- DailyKos (Michigan tag)
- Enviro-Mich List Serve archives
- Democratic Underground, Michigan Forum
- Jack Lessenberry
- JenniferGranholm.com
- LeftyBlogs (Michigan)
- MI Eye on Bishop
- Michigan Coalition for Progress
- Michigan Messenger
- MI Idea (Michigan Equality)
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan
- Rainbow Mittens
- The Upper Hand (Progress Michigan)

Upper Peninsula:
- Keweenaw Now
- Lift Bridges and Mine Shafts
- Save the Wild UP

Western Michigan:
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott
- Mostly Sunny with a Chance of Gay
- Public Pulse
- West Michigan Politics
- West Michigan Rising
- Windmillin'

Mid-Michigan:
- Among the Trees
- Blue Chips (CMU College Democrats Blog)
- Christine Barry
- Conservative Media
- Far Left Field
- Graham Davis
- Honest Errors
- ICDP:Dispatch (Isabella County Democratic Party Blog)
- Liberal, Loud and Proud
- Livingston County Democratic Party Blog
- MI Blog
- Mid-Michigan DFA
- Pohlitics
- Random Ramblings of a Somewhat Common Man
- Waffles of Compromise
- YAF Watch

Flint/Bay Area/Thumb:
- Bay County Democratic Party
- Blue November
- East Michigan Blue
- Genesee County Young Democrats
- Greed, Eggs, and Ham
- Jim Stamas Watch
- Meddling Outsider
- Saginaw County Democratic Party Blog
- Stone Soup Musings
- Voice of Mordor

Southeast Michigan:
- A2Politico
- arblogger
- Arbor Update
- Congressman John Conyers (CD14)
- Mayor Craig Covey
- Councilman Ron Suarez
- Democracy for Metro Detroit
- Detroit Skeptic
- Detroit Uncovered (formerly "Fire Jerry Oliver")
- Grosse Pointe Democrats
- I Wish This Blog Was Louder
- Kicking Ass Ann Arbor (UM College Democrats Blog)
- LJ's Blogorific
- Mark Maynard
- Michigan Progress
- Motor City Liberal
- North Oakland Dems
- Oakland Democratic Politics
- Our Michigan
- Peters for Congress (CD09)
- PhiKapBlog
- Polygon, the Dancing Bear
- Rust Belt Blues
- Third City
- Thunder Down Country
- Trusty Getto
- Unhinged

MI Congressional
District Watch Blogs:
- Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood (CD08)

MI Campaigns:
MI Democratic Orgs:
MI Progressive Orgs:
MI Misc.:
National Alternative Media:
National Blogs:
Powered by: SoapBlox