Latest Two Joes: Someone should challenge Stupak

mea maxima culpa (0.00 / 0)

Too much on my plate these last few days to post the show. It was recorded on Friday, March 5th.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Listen to "Two Guys Named Joe - The DiSano and Munem report" - the most listened to political podcast in the State of Michigan.

---

by: Joe Munem @ Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 18:36:17 PM UTC

Not a biggie... (0.00 / 0)

It actually makes his comments look more astute.  DiSano said it Friday. It happened three days later, and then the prediction isn't made public for another two days.  That means you can rule out the candidacy as a product of being egged on by the show's content, and focus on the predictive nature of his comments.

Among the Trees

---

by: Eric B. @ Wed Mar 10, 2010 at 19:08:55 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Some folks are suggesting (0.00 / 0)

that the changes Stupak are pushing for would preclude any person receiving federal money of any kind would even preclude them from buying private insurance to cover abortion services.

So if you get financial aid, young female college student, or food stamps, poor female woman, or a federal contract owner of a business...you are SOL.

If true, Stupak is morally reprehensible individual and needs to go.

---

by: Nazgul35 @ Thu Mar 11, 2010 at 14:35:07 PM UTC

Stupak (0.00 / 0)

I see Rachel Madow is going after Stupak and raising some very interesting questions about who has paid his room rent all these many years. She also points out his anti-abortion ploys can't be included in health care legislation under the reconciliation process.

It looks like Michael Moore is taking up the cause also. Maybe there is hope for rational representation in D.C. come November.

---

by: cueball @ Thu Mar 11, 2010 at 18:10:25 PM UTC

[ Parent ]