A SoapBlox Politics Blog
[Mobile Edition]
About
- About Us
- Email Us (news/tips)
- Editorial Policy
- Posting Guidelines
- Advertise Here
Feedburner

Subscribe to Michlib daily email summary. (Preview)
Enter address:

Donate
Become a sponsor and support our work.

 MichLib sponsor list

Michigan Political Blog Ad Network

Advertise Liberally

50 State Ad Network

AV ballot return rates in the primary

by: Grebner

Mon Aug 30, 2010 at 01:50:13 AM EDT


I have clients who hyperventilate ten weeks before each election, calling me with the rumor that somewhere, some County Clerk has passed at least some AV ballots to the local Clerk, ready to be mailed.  "WE'VE GOT TO GET OUR MAIL OUT!" they scream at me.

I've never been able to convince anybody that - even if the rumor was true, and applied to the Clerks within the correct district (which is never the case) - that most people don't vote their ballots right away.

I've learned not to fight it.  Once I recognize the signs of candidate-psychosis, I know that facts don't matter, advice may be asked but is always ignored, and the only relief will come a few hours after the close of the polls.

For the few people who care about this subject, I have assembled some additional tables to ignore, based on the dates ballots were requested and returned in the August primary.  The data is derived from the Secretary of State's AV ballot tracking system, which is generally correct, but has its share of inconsistencies and glitches.

Grebner :: AV ballot return rates in the primary
The first column is the date the ballots were supposedly mailed out.  I have doubts about the ballots supposedly mailed before 6/16, but my clients remain convinced they really happened.  I think some Clerks filled in the data prematurely - but I also doubt that Elvis is still alive.
The second column shows the number of ballots mailed on each day.  I removed days with fewer than 1000 ballots, mainly a combination of Saturdays, Sundays and typos. 
The third, fourth, and fifth columns are the date on which the specified fraction of ballots had been returned to the Clerk and logged into the system.  Notice that for the heavy mailout dates (June 16 through July 4) it took an week for even 10% of the ballots to be returned, and well over two weeks to reach 50%.  
Regardless when they were requested, ballots were still pouring in a few days before the election.
The last column reflects ballots which were never returned.  (More precisely, they weren't counted.  Some of them came back after election day, or with a missing signature.) 
 
BALLOT   # of   Fraction returned   % NEVER   %VOTED AT
SENT BALLOTS 10% 50% 75% RETURNED CLERKS OFC
6/09     2040   6/29   7/20   7/30       8 
6/11 2365 6/30 7/22 7/31 13
6/14 3141 6/30 7/20 7/30 8
6/15 8372 6/28 7/20 7/29 8
6/16 12864 6/29 7/22 7/30 8
6/17 14730 6/29 7/20 7/30 8
6/18 11865 6/28 7/20 7/30 9
6/21 23155 6/29 7/20 7/30 8
6/22 15510 7/01 7/21 7/30 9
6/23 23764 7/01 7/21 7/30 7
6/24 19898 7/06 7/24 7/30 9
6/25 14809 7/02 7/23 7/30 8
6/28 31563 7/06 7/22 7/30 8 1
6/29 15870 7/07 7/22 7/30 8 1
6/30 13631 7/07 7/21 7/30 7
7/01 11181 7/09 7/24 7/30 8 1
7/02 22625 7/09 7/23 7/31 9
7/03 2777 7/12 7/26 7/31 8
7/06 17357 7/12 7/23 7/31 9 1
7/07 19560 7/13 7/26 7/31 10 1
7/08 20008 7/13 7/23 7/30 8 1
7/09 15061 7/14 7/26 7/30 10 1
7/12 8356 7/16 7/28 8/02 10 2
7/13 6498 7/19 7/29 8/02 9 3
7/14 11935 7/20 7/28 8/02 12 2
7/15 5089 7/20 7/28 8/02 11 3
7/16 3600 7/20 7/29 8/02 9 5
7/19 6376 7/22 7/29 8/02 10 5
7/20 5480 7/23 7/29 8/02 9 8
7/21 5792 7/26 7/29 8/02 10 5
7/22 5110 7/26 7/30 8/02 9 8
7/23 4932 7/26 7/30 8/02 9 9
7/26 8033 7/28 7/31 8/03 8 11
7/27 7388 7/29 8/02 8/03 9 13
7/28 6891 7/29 8/02 8/03 10 16
7/29 7528 7/30 8/02 ---- 10 23
7/30 6771 7/31 8/03 ---- 11 34
7/31 2685 8/02 ---- ---- 13 47
8/02 5095 8/03 ---- ---- 3 89
[Edited 9/3/2010 to exclude from analysis ballots cast the same day they were issued, i.e.: voted at the Clerk's office rather than being mailed.  The "10%", "50%" and "75%" columns reflect only ballots mailed out and returned in time to be counted.] 
 
 
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
LOL @ "candidate-psychosis" (0.00 / 0)
I KNOW what you mean!

Respectfully,

Ken R. Whittaker

Caucus & Club Coordinator, Membership Director, and Webmaster

14th District Democratic Party

Executive Director, President Emeritus

Young Democrats of Michigan


There is a wide range of symptoms. (0.00 / 0)
It's not just about AV ballots; it's a pervasive distortion of reality.  Once affected, otherwise sensible people seriously begin to believe the only reason for the sun to rise is to allow daylight for door-to-door canvassing.  They assume lost-cat posters on telephone poles carry coded political messages.  They believe that a huge lead could be overcome, or thrown away, by wearing a jacket with a different color, or by the nuance of a single word buried in the eighth paragraph of a page five story in a newspaper no one reads.

Fortunately, it's never fatal, and rarely leaves lasting disability, beyond a tendency to recur.


[ Parent ]
Recur at highly predictible intervals. (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
Thanks for this - (4.00 / 1)
highly informative and useful. Passing this on to campaigns with AV programs.

Yeah, but they won't believe you. (0.00 / 0)
"Don't 90% of them return their ballots the day after they receive them?".

Exact words of a long-time client, last month.

I think there's a tendency toward faster turnaround when the ballot carries only a few, simple choices.  I think people hold their ballots longer when it contains obscure offices (Wayne State Board of Governors, Register of Deeds, Court of Appeals) or vague ballot proposals ("To Establish a Separate Tax Limitation and reestablish the maximum operating tax levy for the county, general law townships and intermediate school district.").  


[ Parent ]
Procrastination (0.00 / 0)
I've certainly almost always procrastinated when I voted absentee.  And it was because I wanted to do some more research on some of the more obscure races.

But I suppose as a Candidate, I would be more worried about missing the 20% (or, as it turns out, 5%) who are prompt than about getting it there a few extra days too early for the procrastinators.


[ Parent ]
Thank you! (0.00 / 0)
I was always under the impression that people voted them right away as well, and its helpful to know that this is not true.

Shame you can't get a hold (0.00 / 0)
of individual data on ballot return...

There would be some interesting info in that.


I've got it. (0.00 / 0)
I have individual level data on date ballot was applied for and date it was returned (if ever).  I don't know who they voted for, of course, if that's what you meant.  But the data grain size is very small.

It's by linking the individual ballot information back to my statewide voter file that allows me to say things (as I have in the past) that Republican ballots are coming back a few percentage points faster than Democratic ones, or whatever.

There are various flaws in the data, but it consists of roughly one million transactions showing that a particular person took a specific action on a particular day.

If you have a research project in mind, I'd be happy to send you a slice of data....


[ Parent ]
Cool (0.00 / 0)
I was thinking about the type of voter kind of study.

In other words, what can we say about those who send back early as opposed to those who send back later (or not at all).

This could greatly impact campaign contact activities re: informational versus persuasive, GOTV tactics (for those who don't turn in) or locking them down early (before anything bad could happen).

Especially when you consider some states that use Absentee ballots exclusively (Oregon I think) and states that use early voting (could inform us about that behavior as well).  


[ Parent ]
Individual return dates (0.00 / 0)
Does this mean you can tell the candidates "Sure, it went out, but these are probably the only hundred you need to contact this week"

Would that ease their crazy, or only make it worse?


[ Parent ]
The main use of individual AV data (0.00 / 0)
...is to allow the candidate first to mail to the flood of people who submit applications before the ballots are ready, then to parcel out additional mail to the dribble of applications that are received from them on.  Finally, it allows names of people who have returned their ballots to be dropped entirely from remaining mailings.

There are all sorts of theoretical tactics that could be employed based on classification of absentee voters by whether they vote early or late, or possibly might not vote at all, but in practice, all we deal with is the fact somebody has a ballot, and later doesn't have it any more.

If the Democratic Party could abandon GOTV practices that would have made sense to developmentally disabled people living in 1960, the AV data would be used to track down unreturned ballots in the hands of Dem/D-leaning voters.  But that's WAY beyond their practical reach.


[ Parent ]
Slight update to AV data from the primary (0.00 / 0)
I added columns to show ballots:

1) that weren't mailed out, because the applicant received the ballot in person at the Clerk's office, voted it, and returned it to the Clerk the same day, and

2) that were mailed out, but not returned in time to be counted.



Search
Progressive Blogroll
For MI Bloggers:
- MI Bloggers Facebook
- MI Bloggers Myspace
- MI Bloggers PartyBuilder
- MI Bloggers Wiki

Statewide:
- Blogging for Michigan
- Call of the Senate Dems
- [Con]serving Michigan (Michigan LCV)
- DailyKos (Michigan tag)
- Enviro-Mich List Serve archives
- Democratic Underground, Michigan Forum
- Jack Lessenberry
- JenniferGranholm.com
- LeftyBlogs (Michigan)
- MI Eye on Bishop
- Michigan Coalition for Progress
- Michigan Messenger
- MI Idea (Michigan Equality)
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan
- Rainbow Mittens
- The Upper Hand (Progress Michigan)

Upper Peninsula:
- Keweenaw Now
- Lift Bridges and Mine Shafts
- Save the Wild UP

Western Michigan:
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott
- Mostly Sunny with a Chance of Gay
- Public Pulse
- West Michigan Politics
- West Michigan Rising
- Windmillin'

Mid-Michigan:
- Among the Trees
- Blue Chips (CMU College Democrats Blog)
- Christine Barry
- Conservative Media
- Far Left Field
- Graham Davis
- Honest Errors
- ICDP:Dispatch (Isabella County Democratic Party Blog)
- Liberal, Loud and Proud
- Livingston County Democratic Party Blog
- MI Blog
- Mid-Michigan DFA
- Pohlitics
- Random Ramblings of a Somewhat Common Man
- Waffles of Compromise
- YAF Watch

Flint/Bay Area/Thumb:
- Bay County Democratic Party
- Blue November
- East Michigan Blue
- Genesee County Young Democrats
- Greed, Eggs, and Ham
- Jim Stamas Watch
- Meddling Outsider
- Saginaw County Democratic Party Blog
- Stone Soup Musings
- Voice of Mordor

Southeast Michigan:
- A2Politico
- arblogger
- Arbor Update
- Congressman John Conyers (CD14)
- Mayor Craig Covey
- Councilman Ron Suarez
- Democracy for Metro Detroit
- Detroit Skeptic
- Detroit Uncovered (formerly "Fire Jerry Oliver")
- Grosse Pointe Democrats
- I Wish This Blog Was Louder
- Kicking Ass Ann Arbor (UM College Democrats Blog)
- LJ's Blogorific
- Mark Maynard
- Michigan Progress
- Motor City Liberal
- North Oakland Dems
- Oakland Democratic Politics
- Our Michigan
- Peters for Congress (CD09)
- PhiKapBlog
- Polygon, the Dancing Bear
- Rust Belt Blues
- Third City
- Thunder Down Country
- Trusty Getto
- Unhinged

MI Congressional
District Watch Blogs:
- Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood (CD08)

MI Campaigns:
MI Democratic Orgs:
MI Progressive Orgs:
MI Misc.:
National Alternative Media:
National Blogs:
Powered by: SoapBlox