A SoapBlox Politics Blog
[Mobile Edition]
About
- About Us
- Email Us (news/tips)
- Editorial Policy
- Posting Guidelines
- Advertise Here
Feedburner

Subscribe to Michlib daily email summary. (Preview)
Enter address:

Donate
Become a sponsor and support our work.

 MichLib sponsor list

Michigan Political Blog Ad Network

Advertise Liberally

50 State Ad Network

15 weeks until filing deadline: Congressional campaigns heat up; DFA voting underway

by: ScottyUrb

Tue Jan 31, 2012 at 15:28:29 PM EST


Senate: Senator Stabenow's campaign is beginning to collect nominating petitions for her re-election. It's generally a routine part of a campaign - getting 15,000-30,000 signatures to appear on the ballot. But In 2006, Republican Jerry Zandstra failed to qualifty for the Republican primary balloty by just a few dozen signatures. In 2010, Alma Wheeler Smith dropped out of the race for governor the day nominating petitions were due - leading many to believe that she couldn't get all the signatures she needed. For Stabenow and Hoekstra, getting on the ballot should just be formality. For tea partiers like Hekman, Durant, etc., one wonders if any of them will be tripped up by the requirement. (And no, don't expect all tea partiers to rally around one candidate at their confab this coming month.)

House 1, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11: Be sure to vote for your picks for DFA's  Grassroots All-Star program! Gary McDowell, Derek Bailey, Dan Kildee, John Waltz, Lance Enderle, Henry Yanez and Syed Taj are representing the Great Lakes State in this vote.

House 7, 8, 11: Tim Walberg, Mike Rogers, and Thaddeus McCotter are all facing primary challenges, per Politics1. Yes, even they are too liberal for some.

House 13: As Eric mentioned, Conyers is a sponsor of SOPA. Not good. Three things, though: 1) Even if it does pass, Obama has said he will veto it. 2) It's not always a good idea to be a 'single-issue' voter. 3. Nobody has explained to me why a 24-term legend like Conyers is facing three state lawmakers. Why are they all running against Conyers? And moe importantly, why should Conyers go? I have yet to see any solid answers.

I have heard that with three African-Americans in the race, Anderson might be able to win because the district is 43% white.  Anderson would need to get most whites and probably some non-whites to vote for him. That said, he's got quite a bit of grassroots support, so it could happen. Plus, the non-Detroit parts of the district usually see higher turnout than Detroit. I wonder, however, if Conyers might benefit from a split anti-Conyers vote. It could go either way (or neither way).

House 14: Brenda Lawrence is set to announce tomorrow that she's running for Congress, challenging Gary Peters and Hansen Clarke. The mayor of Southfueld ran for Oakland County Eecutive against L. Brooks Patterson in 2008 and, as we all know, was our nominee for Lieutenant Governor. If Lawrence somehow manages to win the primary, she would be one of the few people to defeat two incumbent congressmen in a primary.

If I lived in the 14th, I would have a hard time picking who I would support. They're all outstanding. I can see the winner of this race going on to run for Senate in 2014 (assuming the then-80-year-old Levin retires - as he had originally planned to in 2008).

House 13, 14: One thing that Clarke, Peters, Lawrence, Conyers, Anderson, Jackson, and Johnson all have in common is that they are all great Democrats and would do a great job in Congress. Too bad only two of them can win. My concern, though, is that if Peters and Anderson win, Michigan will likely be the most populous state in the unio with an all-white Congressional delegation. Think about that.

ScottyUrb :: 15 weeks until filing deadline: Congressional campaigns heat up; DFA voting underway
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Some State lawmakers need a new job (4.00 / 1)
The reps primaring Conyers either face term limits or soon will. They need jobs, and there's a new district. Anderson, Jackson, and Johnson I believe are all term limited.

Conyers is over 80, and his wife is in prison and very, very, very, unpopular. Carolyn Kilpatrick lost partly because of her son, and partly due to Hansen Clarke being a hell of a campaigner with a nice-guy reputation. I think many reps there see an opening.

I think Peters has no chance, and that the "Crossover white" vote won't necessarily go his away as it would if it was Conyers v Peters. Hansen Clarke ran very will with white people in his elections, much more than Carolyn Kilpatrick and John Conyers did in previous races (comparing them to top of the ticket). Brenda Lawrence by all accounts has a good rep as a competent mayor in a tough position with demographic changes (income class, not race - Southfield's been black majority for years).

I think Clarke will win, but wouldn't be surprised if Lawrence did. Conyers I think has a tougher race with more variables.  

"He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security" - Benjamin Franklin


Anderson and Johnson aren't term-limited (4.00 / 1)
Anderson's term goes through 2014, and Johnson is in his first term and could be in office until 2018. Shanelle Jackson is term-limited, however.

I disagree about Peters having no chance. He has an incredible ground game and broad support. I'd say he's the favorite at this point.

Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott


[ Parent ]
No chance? (4.00 / 1)
You say Peters has no chance? I would say that is not a very astute evaluation. Not only has he been a good Representitive, but take a look at his campaign filing figures. He has , by far, the most cash. It's too bad that Clarke will have to leave Congress. He's a good man.

[ Parent ]
It's not just SOPA with Conyers (0.00 / 0)
Conyers has repeatedly tried to extend copyright protections beyond what is reasonable at the expense of the public interest. For instance, he also favors overturning the NIH Public Access Policy. While I agree with you that single-issue voting is not generally a good practice, these positions make me question Conyers' judgment and if I were in his district, I would give Anderson a strong look.

Conyers (0.00 / 0)
Conyers time has come and gone.  He's probably stayed a term or two too many for my liking.  If I lived in the district, it'd be time to thank him for his service and send him on his way.  I think it's time that all the old guard stand down, many of them being 80+ and let others take the reins.  Conyers has definitely been slipping as of late.

In the 14th, if by some chance Clarke gets bumped, I'd hope it'd be in favor for Lawrence.  I'm a huge fan of Clarke, easily one of the most genuine people in Congress, so I do hope he survives.  There has been much made about the expanded borders of these districts into the suburbs, but my gut tells me that these will continue to be very much Detroit-based districts for a time to come, and I think that's a good thing.


A Note on the 14th (0.00 / 0)
In the nearly five months since Rep. Gary Peters announced his run for the 14th District and Rep. Hansen Clarke "traded" districts with Rep. John Conyers so he could run there as well, I've been very impressed by the civility shown.

So far as I can tell, neither Peters nor Clarke has gone negative against his opponent (I'm on Peters' email list and Clarke's Facebook group). This is a good thing.

But now, with only six months until the August primary, and the March 10 Democratic "Endorsement Convention" looming, will Brenda Lawrence have to go negative to get some traction against two sitting members of Congress who have served honorably and scandal-free, each of whom have entrenched constituents and money in the bank (Peters has a lot more, but Clarke isn't exactly squeezing nickels)?

The attack lines are pretty obvious:

Hansen Clarke is a freshman, charismatic but light on accomplishments, with a tendency towards "big progressive ideas" that are doomed to never see a committee vote, never mind becoming law. Comparing Clarke in 2011 to Peters in 2009 (his first year) shows a stark contrast in how effective each was in getting bills and amendments passed -- though to be fair, Peters was part of a huge Democratic majority supporting a popular President, whereas Clarke took office along with the new Tea Party-driven GOP House majority. That said, Clarke's far too liberal for the "Greater Detroit" of the NEW 14th, which is after all more than half suburban.

Gary Peters has a more conservative voting record (given his background and the "purple" nature of the current 9th, this is not a shock), and has on several occasions been lumped in with the dreaded "Blue Dogs." He has voted against the President more often than Clarke, and could be portrayed as "representing white suburban business interests over the people of the City of Detroit" -- highlighted by the fact that Clarke is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.


[ Parent ]
Just to be clear.... (0.00 / 0)
the March 10 Endorsement Convention will not have any legislative races on the agenda. Only Supreme Court and Education Boards (state Bd of Ed, UofM, MSU, Wayne).

[ Parent ]
7th District... (0.00 / 0)
Is any Democrat running against "Congressman Tim"?  I've heard no names for the seat.  Maybe with redistricting the chances are small, but I bet Howard Dean's 50 State plan would at least have a credible candidate to contest the seat.  I'm sorry Mark Schauer isn't running again...  

recruitment agencies (0.00 / 1)
That said, he's got quite a bit of grassroots support, so it could happen. Plus, the non-Detroit parts of the district usually see higher turnout than Detroit. I wonder, however, if Conyers might benefit from a split anti-Conyers vote.
recruitment agencies


Search
Progressive Blogroll
For MI Bloggers:
- MI Bloggers Facebook
- MI Bloggers Myspace
- MI Bloggers PartyBuilder
- MI Bloggers Wiki

Statewide:
- Blogging for Michigan
- Call of the Senate Dems
- [Con]serving Michigan (Michigan LCV)
- DailyKos (Michigan tag)
- Enviro-Mich List Serve archives
- Democratic Underground, Michigan Forum
- Jack Lessenberry
- JenniferGranholm.com
- LeftyBlogs (Michigan)
- MI Eye on Bishop
- Michigan Coalition for Progress
- Michigan Messenger
- MI Idea (Michigan Equality)
- Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan
- Rainbow Mittens
- The Upper Hand (Progress Michigan)

Upper Peninsula:
- Keweenaw Now
- Lift Bridges and Mine Shafts
- Save the Wild UP

Western Michigan:
- Great Lakes Guy
- Great Lakes, Great Times, Great Scott
- Mostly Sunny with a Chance of Gay
- Public Pulse
- West Michigan Politics
- West Michigan Rising
- Windmillin'

Mid-Michigan:
- Among the Trees
- Blue Chips (CMU College Democrats Blog)
- Christine Barry
- Conservative Media
- Far Left Field
- Graham Davis
- Honest Errors
- ICDP:Dispatch (Isabella County Democratic Party Blog)
- Liberal, Loud and Proud
- Livingston County Democratic Party Blog
- MI Blog
- Mid-Michigan DFA
- Pohlitics
- Random Ramblings of a Somewhat Common Man
- Waffles of Compromise
- YAF Watch

Flint/Bay Area/Thumb:
- Bay County Democratic Party
- Blue November
- East Michigan Blue
- Genesee County Young Democrats
- Greed, Eggs, and Ham
- Jim Stamas Watch
- Meddling Outsider
- Saginaw County Democratic Party Blog
- Stone Soup Musings
- Voice of Mordor

Southeast Michigan:
- A2Politico
- arblogger
- Arbor Update
- Congressman John Conyers (CD14)
- Mayor Craig Covey
- Councilman Ron Suarez
- Democracy for Metro Detroit
- Detroit Skeptic
- Detroit Uncovered (formerly "Fire Jerry Oliver")
- Grosse Pointe Democrats
- I Wish This Blog Was Louder
- Kicking Ass Ann Arbor (UM College Democrats Blog)
- LJ's Blogorific
- Mark Maynard
- Michigan Progress
- Motor City Liberal
- North Oakland Dems
- Oakland Democratic Politics
- Our Michigan
- Peters for Congress (CD09)
- PhiKapBlog
- Polygon, the Dancing Bear
- Rust Belt Blues
- Third City
- Thunder Down Country
- Trusty Getto
- Unhinged

MI Congressional
District Watch Blogs:
- Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood (CD08)

MI Campaigns:
MI Democratic Orgs:
MI Progressive Orgs:
MI Misc.:
National Alternative Media:
National Blogs:
Powered by: SoapBlox