I'm not asking who you're voting for, but who's going to win?
This is open to lurkers, spambots, sock-puppets, cranks, and even ML regulars.
To post this comment click here:
Otherwise click cancel.
Of course, I thought John Kerry was going to win...
I know, it is a logical (if not practical) possibility that someone else could be elected, but that hardly makes it a 'compromise' in any meaningful sense. Unless that candidate were somehow more broadly acceptable to a majority of the Party then Lon. But in that case, why is he or she not running now?
But really, I only offered the alternative to increase the confusion.
If Warhawkgundam wants to argue that Johnson should take a backseat and earn his stripes, then that argument is valid for others, perhaps when Obama first ran for president.
Why are you such a big fan of the UAW anyway?
The biggest problem tho is that the UAW throw it's shrinking weigh and dying corpse criteria 1970's around, to control the party, to push the party to the right and to beat down and keep out minorities groups, and interest groups that are consider democratic party groups, from contributing. On that note am not going to sit here and type out everything the UAW has done that has lead the Michigan Democratic Party to were it is now, as that would take much to time, and be much to long, and everyone should know that history.
This vote is truthfully weather you rather have a Party own and controlling by the UAW and their puppet, or would you like to take this chance to support breaking from the UAW and moving toward the left. given this what change do you want a New Face for the puppet, or actually change to the party?
Also you realize the UAW were the one behind keeping the Black caucus from putting up a candidate 2 years ago right?
Are you a UAW member or something?
I didn't vote, because I don't know the internal dem political dynamics. However, if one side has enough votes lined up, oftentimes the person losing drops and takes a consolation prize.
Who do I want to win? I don't know. There's times we destroyed Brewer and times he's destroyed us. "He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security" - Benjamin Franklin
If I'm wrong, please correct me. "The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." ~ Harlan Ellison
It would seem Todd Courser rejected any deals or compromises -- which is consistent with the Tea Party mindset, I'll give him that -- and insisted on a convention floor vote.
A fight where he got 48% of the delegates, despite the support for Chairman Schostak from the Governor, most of the MIGOP "establishment" and the party's biggest donors.
Was the anti-Schostak vote based on ideology, competence or a combination? Did Michigan Right to Life and/or the NRA play a role similar to the unions' at the MDP?
How did this Schostak-Courser split manifest at the district level? I heard third-hand that Rep. Kerry Bentivolio was not pleased by events in the 11th District leadership races. What about Rep. Justin Amash in the 3rd or Rep. Tim Walberg in the 7th?
What happens to Mr. Courser and his supporters now? Were they straight Tea Party, or did he also attract the Libertarians? Is there really a distinction between those two groups anymore? Does he get a vice-chairmanship or something?
Sorry...probably far too many questions. Whatever response you care to provide is fine by me. "The two most common elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." ~ Harlan Ellison