|
|
Tue Dec 12, 2006 at 16:21:06 PM EST
|
We ran out of time. That's it, plain and simple.
Trying to educate 148 state lawmakers about net neutrality - let alone
trying to build a political consensus on the issue - midway through the
final month of the lame duck session is - shall we say- one tall order. Espcially tall
when you consider AT&T has hired all but about two lobbyists in
town, promised 2,000 new jobs, thrown all kinds of campaign
contributions around, secured the support of the AFL-CIO. Not to mention the impact term limits has on all of this!
This is why I suggested that we would be better off trying to solicit people to oppose HB 6456 for other reasons besides
net neutrality (e.g., a la carte channel selection) - reasons that
require little explanation and have some immediate political traction.
But alas, it was not to be.
Google knew the jig was up. That's why they decided to back off. So did the Governor.
Just read the papers: the MSM refuses to even take net neutrality seriously. Most of the stories coming out about HB 6456 now mention it as an afterthought (take, for instance, this one from the AP). Yesterday,
MIRS even went so far as to call net neutrality a "theory."
You can blame me or the trash the Michigan netroots if you want. You
can blame the Governor and call her a DLC hack if that makes you feel
better. But the truth is that Google and co. failed to get her a
modicum of political cover she would need to take a stand on this.
And...give credit where credit is due: AT&T came prepared.
But wait! Can't Governor Granholm veto the whole thing?
Let's look at the numbers:
House margin on HB 6456: 86-21
Number of House votes needed to override gubernatorial veto: 73
Senate margin on HB 6456: 26-12
Number of Senate votes needed to override gubernatorial veto: 25
And you could be sure as part of all of this that the Governor would be
personally tarred and feathered for losing 2,000 jobs - rightly or
wrongly. True, she doesn't need to run for re-election again. But it
isn't exactly the best prelude for her second term.
One of the sad ironies here is that Governor Granholm actually supports net neutrality. But look at those numbers above. Asking
her to fight this alone is simply unrealistic.
Time to move on. |
| matt :: What happened on net neutrality |
|
|
|