|
|
fiscal sanity
Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 16:53:25 PM EST
|
|
...as waxed today by Sen. Mickey Switalski of Roseville. Quite fitting for the season if I may so myself. Enjoy the video here, or read the pretty prose below - Annus Mirabilis, A Fiscal Odyssey Sing, Goddess, the Wrath of Constituencies displeased, As Solons took budgets in both hands and squeezed. Then, weary with cuts, dropped the red budget axe And seized its hated rival, the increase in tax.
Heroes searched for a cure to the Plague economic Hit on Revenue, Cuts and Reforms as the tonic-- That many brave Pols to the Fate of Recalls sent While their bodies by Perks the Pig were rent.
Say then, What Cause first locked the parties in strife? Some say it was term limits that shortened our life. Or exuberant tax cuts. Or government waste. Whatever it was, we Chronic Deficits faced.
Granholm threw down the Gauntlet at her State of the State. Said she "Sales Tax on Services will be Structurally Great." The blown away 'Crats cast their votes for fair Jenny Even Fiscal Conservatives, like two-penny Denny.
But with just sixteen votes, it was never enough. Lawmakers decided to chew on this stuff. Insurmountable problems, an abundance of critics. Tempting solutions that hid pitfalls and gimmicks. Oh yes, there's lots more where that came from...
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 706 words in story)
|
|
Sat Dec 01, 2007 at 06:42:28 AM EST
|
This from the AP:The state Legislature early Saturday started the process of repealing and replacing an unpopular tax on services.
The Senate voted 33-4 to approve a tentative agreement ditching the tax shortly before adjourning at about 5 a.m. The House was expected to convene at about 3:30 p.m. and vote later in the day.
Since the service tax technically went into effect at midnight, the replacement tax will reportedly include a provision that will protect businesses from having to collect service taxes for one day (or whatever it ultimately winds up being). This has also been agreed to be the Governor and Speaker Dillon.
Other details of the deal come to us from the Detroit Free Press: 21.95% surcharge on the Michigan Business Tax to replace lost state revenue.
$6 million is the largest surcharge any company would pay.
2017 is when the surcharge is to expire. That last one ticks me off, but I guess kicking the can 10 years down the road is better than 4 years. Judging by the wide margin in the Senate, I'd be surprised if it faced any real challenges - immediate effect or otherwise - in the House. Assuming everything works out, can we finally move on to other things? There's plenty of work to do that's piled up in the Legislature while all of this has dragged on.
(Go below the fold to read the Governor's press release...)
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 494 words in story)
|
|
Thu Nov 29, 2007 at 08:06:16 AM EST
|
First off, I have an MSM beef. All this morning, our local Lansing-area
NPR affiliate has been repeating stories over and over about the
stalemate on fixing the "widely despised" and "much-hated" service tax.
That's pretty much been the trend across all of Michigan's media, who
now seem to be perfectly comfortable using all sorts of unequivocal
qualifers like "despised" and "hated" in front of "service tax." (Just
like Dick DeVos always used to insert the words "jobs-killing" in front
of "Single Business Tax")
Yes, OK, the serivce tax is pretty durned unpopular with business
owners. No doubt about that. Especially ones who will have to start
collecting it Saturday unless something changes right quick. But to me
loaded words like "despised" and "hated" suggest there are legions of
angry citizens outside the statehouse carrying buckets of stones, tar
and deer rifles and getting ready to break the door with a
battering ram.
Let's be clear: they're not. In spite of whatever spin the Detroit
Chamber might try to attach to it - an
EPIC-MRA poll from a couple of weeks ago shows 55% of
respondents opposed to applying the sales tax to certain services. A
majority sure, but really, what taxes do people like? The
"widely-popular income tax?" Or the "much-beloved property tax?"
If 55% is all that's required for the MSM to unequivoically start
labeling things "despised" or "hated", I suppose we can at least exepct
them to start inserting the words "widely despised" before
"President Bush" or "Congressman Tim Walberg." Any day now...
Anyway, the MSM's opinioneering aside, the sad thing about this whole
service tax stalemate is that on the major issue, there is
actually genuine consensus!
(More below the fold...)
|
|
There's More...
:: (30
Comments, 469 words in story)
|
|
Wed Nov 21, 2007 at 11:08:52 AM EST
|
|
Before you grab your knife and fork tomorrow, consider giving Republican out-of-state special-interest groups a different kind of bird to eat, like a little crow.
Thanks to the miracles of these Intertubes, now you can help stop the Pig Man from the comfort of your keyboard. By donating online to the campaigns of two the Democratic representatives whom have already had recall language passed, Marie Donigan of Royal Oak and Robert Dean of Grand Rapids, you can help halt these extremist measures. As it stands right now, you'll donate to each individual on a separate site. Be sure to tack on an extra 37 cents to your donation to let them know you're a member of the Michigan Liberal community. Remember, these dedicated public servants really need your support for all of the different facets required to fight these turkeys, and you can rest assured that your donation will go to fight to take Michigan back from the extremists who wish to destroy it. Donate to Happy Thanksgiving from your MichLib Family!!
|
|
Discuss
:: (2
Comments)
|
|
Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 13:45:13 PM EDT
|
|
Halloween is over, but Mike Rogers is still wearing his Fiscal Responsibility costume.
He's written another fact-free letter on budget policy targeting Congressman Charlie Rangel (D-NY), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee. Displaying a shaky grasp of the Michigan Constitution, federal tax policy and how Congress enacts laws, Rogers writes
On the heels of Democrat Governor Granholm raising income taxes on every Michigan family by 12% and adding a new 6 percent tax on services, Representative Charlie Rangel, the Democratic chairman of the Ways and Means committee and the man in charge of writing all tax laws, recently introduced a plan that will further hurt Michigan’s economy and families. As with most of Mr. Rogers’ oh-so-scary pronouncements, there isn’t much “there” there when you strip away the partisan rhetoric. Rogers is actually referring to H.R. 3970, The Tax Reduction and Reform Act of 2007. The opening paragraph from the Ways and Means Committee summary reads:
The combination of the general tax reductions below and full repeal of the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) would result in tax relief for approximately 91 million families. Even with offsets, virtually all families with income under $500,000 will see a net tax reduction. (emphasis mine; please note that the phrase “except for Michiganders” does not appear in this description.)
Without making everyone’s eyes glaze over – including mine – here’s a quick overview of H.R. 3970:
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 615 words in story)
|
|
Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 09:22:44 AM EDT
|
|
Once there was a man from humble beginnings who became very successful. He had served in the Marines, then put himself through Michigan State University while working the night shift at the Oldsmobile assembly line in Lansing. He would later be the first African-American man elected to the Lansing city council and to serve on the Ingham County Board. He would become a successful real estate developer and TV station owner. All along he would grow as a power broker for the state Democratic Party, sitting on various boards, and eventually becoming Chairman of the Michigan State University Board of Trustees. This highly accomplished man, Joel I. Ferguson, would offer to build a new headquarters for the Michigan State Police (MSP) on a triangular piece of land next to the Grand River. This he would do because the current headquarters, in a building owned by Michigan State University, was deemed too old and decrepit. Afterall, it needed a new roof, which was estimated to cost $2.3 million to redo, and yearly maintenance costs were running up to $340,000. Repairs and upgrades to the current facilities were estimated to be as high as $16 million. Even though MSU was only charging the state $1 per year to lease the facilities, surely the Michigan State Police deserved a brand new, state-of-the-art facility.
The state Republican and Democratic parties don’t have pension or retirement plans for longtime supporters. So they have to go about things a little differently; they use government money for projects that will benefit their most loyal supporters.
|
|
There's More...
:: (27
Comments, 376 words in story)
|
|
Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 16:23:12 PM EDT
|
|
Late Monday afternoon, recall language was filed against two more Democratic state representatives, almost immediately following the rejection by the Macomb County Election Commission in the case against Rep. Steve Beida of Warren.
Marie Donigan of Royal Oak is extremely well-liked in her district, and as poster NorthernLib points out, she received over 62% of the vote in the 26th district. It is worth noting that Donigan is in Oakland County, whose Election Commission holds a Republican majority.
Joel Sheltrown of West Branch near the Cadillac area is also a bit of a surprise. While the 103rd District trends red, Sheltrown is a well-liked moderate Democrat who won with over 69% of the vote.
It is unclear why these two specific legislators were chosen, but Donigan's name had been rumored as being on the list of recalls back a couple months ago when it was first being drawn. There are also several questions as to why these recalls are just now being announced.
Stay tuned as we bring you the latest.
|
|
Discuss
:: (9
Comments)
|
|
Mon Oct 29, 2007 at 14:58:31 PM EDT
|
|
From the House: Six budget bills have passed! This is everything except DHS (Dept. of Health and Human Services) which -- of course -- is a biggie. Read this AP article for more. They're planning a late night in the house tonight, so get your jammies and popcorn and stop in later for updates as they come in. Up next: A minimum of at least eight budget bills are expected to be voted out the House tonight. Sources are projecting a total of 10 budget bills in all. From the Senate: The Senate just passed the conference committee reports on History, Arts and Libraries (HAL), Dept. of Labor and Economic Growth (DLEG), and Military and Veterans Affairs. Up next: The State Police Budget. As of now, our sources inside the House report that there will be no layoffs of troopers, but two crime labs willl close, certainly effecting civil servants. For a continually updated list, click here for info from the Senate Fiscal Agency. (Warning - it's a .pdf and it will require Adobe to open.) The Senate is adjourned until 10 a.m. tomorrow morning. Watch House TV and Senate TV live. ~Liberal Lucy and Diane
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 13:56:03 PM EDT
|
Why am I even surprised to read this noon update from the AP? House Democrats say they're ready to start moving budget bills now.
But Senate Republicans say votes won't occur until next week. That's because they want final agreement on sticking points before they pass other parts of the budget. Translation: Mike Bishop and his band of not-so-merry men and angry women want to make sure that there are plenty of concessions for themselves before they say yes to anything that might make them look bad in the eyes of the ultra-conservative Right.
At what point do even the most right-wing of Michigan citizens throw up their hands and say enough is enough!?
And while Mikey primps for his next round of interviews with the press, state employees are continuing to feel the pain. This from the AP's Tim Martin - As Michigan lawmakers work toward an agreement on a new spending plan, some state departments already are planning temporary layoffs and other cutbacks to make ends meet. Sick, this just plain sick. Time to start emailing and calling your state legislators, again.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Fri Oct 26, 2007 at 09:15:00 AM EDT
|
|
Update: Pete's not getting a lot of love over at DailyKos. Feel free to stop by and chime in! Just when it seemed to be the least likely of four-legged creatures to cause a splash in the political arena, the turtle beats the hare for the win. I'm guessing that Republican Rubberstamper Congressman Pete Hoekstra of West Michigan is wishing he had never heard of the little guys.
After having a temper-tantrum in front of the press about a federally-funded fence going up in his district to protect turtles and motorists alike, Hoekstra didn't like the response his letter to Governor Granholm got. The entire event was merely posturing for Hoekstra's desired run for Granholm's seat in 2010, it seems to have backfired a bit on him.
While most of the state viewed the tete-a-tete between the Lady Gov and Sneaky Pete from the luxury of their newspapers, Pete couldn't go down without swinging one more lousy punch. I'm also going to take a gander that he's going wake up feeling this one in the morning.
|
|
There's More...
:: (15
Comments, 331 words in story)
|
|
Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 12:00:00 PM EDT
|
|
Negotiations between legislative leaders continue over what to cut in order to plug the $430 million hole in the budget by the end of this month. Many cuts are being considered to state services such as prisons, foster care, teachers, Community Health, and Human Services. The legislature has already passed cuts to teachers’ pension and health care benefits. But it’s also good to be aware of what isn’t under discussion to be cut. Back in May the House passed two bills, HB 4580 and HRC 26. The first would eliminate the lifetime health care benefits that legislators who have served at least 6 years are eligible for after the age of 55. The second bill would cut their $79,650 yearly salaries by 5%. The two bills were then delivered to the Senate where they were placed in the Government Operations Committee. They’ve been sitting in that Senate committee ever since.
Bishop happens to chair the Government Operations Committee. So the fate of those two bills is pretty much in the Senate Majority Leader’s hands. Or maybe under his posterior, since effectively he’s been sitting on them.
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 513 words in story)
|
|
Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 09:15:00 AM EDT
|
The home foreclosure rate is too high, the state budget situation is still unsettled, the National Debt is skyrocketing, personal bankruptcies are at an all-time high... it goes on and on. All day we're bombarded with bad news about money and by the sound of it, there isn't any positive financial news to report.
Bull, and I'm not talking about the markets.
In this state of ours we've got an incredible force of educators, financial institutions, and community organizations coming together in a spirit of unity and philanthropy, to make real change in a very non-partisan kind of way.
Sure, my mom's one of them and I donated my time to design their very non-partisan blog, but this isn't a tale about me, my mom, a blog, or even politics. It's about how a group of people are working to raise this state from the ashes of financial pain to success, and more importantly, the progress they are achieving without the usual partisanship.
|
|
There's More...
:: (5
Comments, 817 words in story)
|
|
Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 10:03:49 AM EDT
|
(the budget crisis isn't over yet. - promoted by JPowers155)
Many Michiganians were left with the impression that the current year budget was finalized with a late night tax deal two weeks ago that ended the short lived drama of a partial state shutdown. That drama is likely to soon be resurrected on Halloween night thanks to the political posturing of legislative Republicans.
Michigan still does not have a budget for the fiscal year that began on October 1. Instead, we only have a month-long continuation of last year's budget and revenue enhancments closing about three quarters of the projected deficit. There is still a roughly $450 million shortfall that must be resolved to finish the budget. The clock is ticking and time runs out at midnight on November 1.
|
|
There's More...
:: (10
Comments, 314 words in story)
|
|
Fri Oct 12, 2007 at 08:19:18 AM EDT
|
Anti-Tax
Jihad Factoid!
Todd Anderson - Vice President of Government Relations for the militant
Small
Business Association of Michigan and one of the chief instigators
of a
possible drive to repeal the service tax and - is also the former
policy director for failed 2006 Republican gubernatorial
candidate Dick
DeVos (a.k.a. The Amway Guy). Small world, eh?
As ProgressiveFemale reported
yesterday, the Pigman has issued his
list of lawmakers targeted for recall: five Democrats and five
Republicans. All of the Republicans are term limited.
Only one of the Democrats (Steve Bieda) is.
Below is the Pigman list - along
with information about where to send your donations. I've included the
Republicans too. While I typically wouldn't advocate giving money to
anyone associated with the party of Bush, in this case I can see a more
important onjective in making sure no lawmaker - Republican or
Democratic - is recalled from office for doing the right thing and
voting for new revenues. If the Pigman can be
stopped here,
hopefully lawmakers will be less timid in dealing with him in
the future. But I'm sure there will be varying opinions on this
question.
Anyway, be sure to tack on an extra 37 cents to
your
check to tell them you're a Michlib reader!
House Speaker Andy Dillon (D-Redford Twp.)
Andy Dillon for State Representative
P.O. Box 395
Allen Park, MI 48101
Rep. Steve Bieda
(D-Warren)
Committee to Elect Steven Bieda
P.O. Box 1311
Warren, MI 48090-1311
Rep. Marc Corriveau
(D-Northville)
Marc Corriveau for
State Representative
P.O. Box 5251
Northville, MI 48167
Rep. Mary Valentine
(D-Muskegon)
Friends
of Mary Valentine (donations accepted online)
P.O. Box 421
Muskegon, MI 49443
Rep. Robert Dean (D-Grand
Rapids)
Friends of Robert Dean
P.O. Box 6861
Grand Rapids, MI 49516
Sen. Wayne Kuipers
(R-Holland)
Wayne Kuipers for State Senate
364 W 31ST
Holland, MI 49423
Rep. Ed Gaffney (R-Grosse
Pointe Farms)
Citizens to Elect Edward J. Gaffney
283 Kenwood Court
Grosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236
Rep. Chris Ward
(R-Brighton)
Chris Ward for State Representative
P.O. Box 1595
Brighton, MI 48116
Sen. Valde Garcia
(R-Howell)
Valde Garcia for State Senate
P.O. Box 2130
Howell, MI 48844
Sen. Gerald Van Woerkom
(R-Muskegon)
Friends of Gerald Van Woerkom
4216 Harbor Point Dr.
Muskegon, MI 49441
|
|
Discuss
:: (33
Comments)
|
|
Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 08:14:53 AM EDT
|
This column from this morning's DFP deserves to be singled out in its own post. Here's the lede:
It is time for responsible voices to speak up and commend those who had the courage to develop a responsible approach to Michigan's very real budget crisis, and thereby avoid a disastrous shutdown of state government.
If we do not speak up, we run the risk of the debate being overwhelmed by the angry voices we hear over and over again repeating the mindless mantra of "no new taxes."
No one likes to pay more taxes. No one likes to go to the dentist, either, but sometimes we have to do that.
As President Franklin Roosevelt once noted, "taxes, after all, are the dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." My, how refreshing. Instead of yet another columnist whining about the new tax on bronzing baby shoes - or one of an endless litany of articles devoted to the Pigman's recall drives and how the new 6% service tax will mean the end of human civilization (I'm sure the advertisers gladly appreciate having their local newspaper "on the team"), Governor Milliken just says "thank you." What an idea!
|
|
Discuss
:: (2
Comments)
|
|
Fri Oct 05, 2007 at 08:13:07 AM EDT
|
1. I'm dismayed to see this
morning that Tom Clay of the highly-esteemed Citizens
Research Council has "blasted" the recent budget
deal as a
"mere quick fix." This from an article by the Detroit Free Press' John
Wisely (who is fresh off an assignment covering the running brouhaha
between hockey legend Gordy Howe and his nosy neighbors).
Clay's specific criticisms are absolutely right: first, that the income
tax hike is flawed because it's temporary and begins to be phased out
in 2011 (after most of the current crop of legislators is gone). I
don't know who's idea it was to include this provision, but shame on
them for it. Sometime after 2011, we can expect to be in the same old
mess again, with griping about recalls and endless late night sessions.
This sort of thing is exactly why I say Michigan should
consider a
paygo (rule or law).
Tom's other beef - that the service tax will be uneven in how
it's applied - is also correct. The governor, of course , did offer a
much fairer 2-percent across the board service tax plan back in
February. But the Senate Republicans (in their infinite wisdom) killed
it a month later. So we have this selective approach
instead.
Pretty it ain't, but hey, the money has to come from somewhere.
Judging from the article, it would seem Clay has nothing good to say
about the deal whatsoever. If that's actually his position, I'd be
surprised. But clearly there are shortcomings in the deal (as noted
above) Still, at least it provides SOME new revenue for the
next few
years...revenue that otherwise would not be there. That's why Professor
Doug Drake is right when he says (in his token last line of the
article) that
"it's a considerable first step."
2. Speaking of the so-called liberal Freep, what the hell is happening
to that paper? Is it just me or do they appear to be trying to outdo
even the Detroit News with its shrill end-of-world/we're all
going to die howling
about the tax increase deal. The headlines today: "Details
of service
tax raise questions" and "Tax
deal blasted as mere quick fix."
Yesterday it was "Recall
voices unite against Granholm." The day
before: "Taxes
may hinder attracting businesses." And then there
was this in Tuesday's
editorial:
There's a lot more work to do in Lansing, despite the
budget deal that
averted a government shutdown Monday morning.
The agreement relies heavily -- too heavily -- on revenues through
sizable new taxes, but the work to date only glances at cuts or
substantive reforms.
-snip-
(L)egislators need to begin thinking more seriously about downsizing
government in a way that reflects the state's own diminution and the
likely sour outlook for the economy.
This from what used to be described as Michigan's left-leaning daily.
Keep this up, Freep, and you'll have to go buy yourself a giant plastic
pig! (In the DFP's defense, they did run a very good column
by Tom Walsh yesterday [who's not known particularly as a
flaming leftist] entitled "New
Tax Burden? Chill Out and Hear
the Truth" It's worth your time.)
3. Speaking of the Freep, the Lansing City Pulse's Bill Petit has
some comments about the the Freep's "a pox on all
their houses" approach to covering state government.
The list continues below the fold...
|
|
There's More...
:: (2
Comments, 388 words in story)
|
|
Thu Oct 04, 2007 at 17:43:10 PM EDT
|
|
Welcome to another round of "Partisan Hacks posing as Journalists". Today we feature one of the most notorious hacks of them all, Frank Beckmann, the WJR radio talk show host who goes out of his way to pledge his allegiance to Unethical Republican Propaganda on a regular basis.
This morning Beckmann of taped an interview with Gov. Granholm that was to be played later in the day. Beckmann, thanks to his minions at the ultra-conservative blog RightMichigan (RM) was already prepped for a partisan slam on nothing but taxes.
Barely bothering to get his facts right in his questions about the recent budget negotiations, Beckmann accused the Governor of lying to the citizens of this state when it came to tax hikes.
To do this, he played the YouTube clip that RM put together of a debate that took place at TV station in Detroit during the '06 Campaign. The interesting part is, RM couldn't be bothered to put up her answer in entirety, but rather just the part that fit their devious desires.
If he had ethics, Beckmann could have just as easily gotten the clip from WXYZ, who actually hosted the debate. Problem is, it wouldn't have suited his dirty tactics. Even Saul Anuzis, Chairman of the MI Republican Party bothered to post the full clip. Wow. It's a sad day when Saul's own people make him look like the good guy.
So why didn't Beckmann play the real, entire clip? Simple, because if he did, he knew the Governor would have known it was a question about replacing revenues from the Single Business Tax (SBT), and not just a blanket "No New Taxes" pledge, and she would have talked about the SBT/Michigan Business Tax (MBT).
|
|
There's More...
:: (3
Comments, 408 words in story)
|
|
Thu Oct 04, 2007 at 12:40:57 PM EDT
|
(Good point - promoted by lpackard)
There's been a lot of angry voices shouting their opposition to the votes to raise taxes to fill the $1.7 billion dollar gap. Republicans across the state have been leading the attack, accusing the Democrats of trying to destroy Michigan's economy while offering no comprehensive solutions of their own to solve the budget deficit. But recent news from Washington DC helps provide some perspective on Republican priorities.
Many of these same voices, most of them Republican, have fully supported President Bush's war in Iraq. They've opposed any efforts to reduce funding for that war. Just this week, the Republicans in Congress voted in support of another $150 billion in additional funding for the war. That's roughly 100 times the amount of the state's budget deficit. That's 100 times the amount of money that Michigan will be investing in its residents. That's $150 billion going over to Iraq to disappear into that black hole, spent on fighting what appears to be an endless war that hasn't produced the outcomes that its promoters promised.
When you hear the angry voices, be sure to point out the skewed priorities of Republicans who will support spending $150 billion on a war in Iraq but won't invest 1/100th that amount into the state of Michigan and its residents.
|
|
Discuss
:: (3
Comments)
|
|
Wed Oct 03, 2007 at 08:37:13 AM EDT
|
The Detroit Free Press reports
this morning that the Small
Business
Association of Michigan is thinking about trying to muscle a
proposal onto the ballot that would repeal or change (they won't say) the new tax on certain services.
Considering SBAM's extreme reputation as sort of Michigan
Militia of state
business organizations (for instance, they teamed
up with the Pigman for the "teabagger" protest earlier this
year), it seems likely they'd just go for outright repeal
(as opposed to just shift to the income tax or other revenue sources)
irrespective of whether it throws the state budget back into massive
deficit and on the brink of another shutdown. Apparently that extra 6%
on skiing, tarot card readings and tanning salons is just too much to
bear.
Unfortunately for SBAM, getting the issue on the ballot would require
some gymnastics (along with a lot of money). We learn this thanks to
Bob LaBrant of the Michigan
Chamber of Commerce (!), quoted in the Freep:
Repealing the new tax law would be difficult, but not
impossible.
A petition drive that collected 304,100 valid signatures -- a steep
requirement -- would force the Legislature to either repeal the law or
put the question before voters on a statewide ballot as early as
November 2008.
What's not possible is a referendum that goes straight to the ballot,
said Bob LaBrant, a legal expert for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce.
He said state law prohibits a referendum to repeal laws intended to
avoid a deficit, which both the higher income tax and sales tax
accomplish.
Huh? Really? What law is that?
Actually, it's not just a law...it's in Article
II §
9 of the Michigan Constitution:
The people reserve to themselves the power to propose
laws and to enact
and reject
laws, called the initiative, and the power to approve or reject laws
enacted by the legislature, called the referendum. The power of
initiative extends only to laws which the legislature may enact under
this constitution. The
power of
referendum does not extend to acts making appropriations
for
state institutions or to meet deficiencies in state funds
and must be invoked in the manner prescribed by law within 90 days
following the final adjournment of the legislative session at which the
law was enacted. To invoke the
initiative or referendum, petitions
signed by a number of registered electors, not less than eight percent
for initiative and five
percent for referendum of the total vote cast
for all candidates for governor at the last preceding general election
at which a governor was elected shall be required.
What does this mean? More below the fold...
|
|
There's More...
:: (18
Comments, 268 words in story)
|
|
Tue Oct 02, 2007 at 14:24:59 PM EDT
|
|
If you can't quite understand what all the fuss around the budget has been about, just consider the giant pair of blinders the state has been wearing these last several months. When my pain from a bothersome kidney stone forced me out of the People's House and into my own, I went into despair. I was more or less sequestered on the couch and bed and off the computer. Like the first-string player who gets injured in the fourth quarter, I felt suddenly useless in this fight. As life usually goes, I stumbled upon a silver lining. It allowed me to see the vast discrepancy in what our media can and will allow us to hear from our government. It sickened me, left me shouting at the TV and the newspaper. It also opened my eyes and my ears. You've heard from us here at MichLib that our readership has reached unbelievable new levels. While we're eternally grateful to you for making us a part of your day, we haven't been the only people following this budget mess day after day. While I was embedded in the House, the press box population grew day by day, with laptops, recorders, and cameras. Nearly every single media outlet was following the story thanks to their stalwart reporters who were there day and night. As the site traffic grew, I just figured it was a fluke and in my gratefulness, I didn't ask questions. That's until I turned on the TV and picked up a newspaper and started to digest what the rest of the state was being force-fed. My goodness, you would have thought we were talking about two different states and two very different battles, but no, in fact they were one and the same. I was amazed about the selective coverage of what the media outlets were reporting, and what they weren't. I got to sample several days of budget coverage from both the Lansing and Detroit media markets, and I suddenly remembered why I never bother to watch TV news or pay for a paper subscription.
|
|
There's More...
:: (13
Comments, 927 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|